Concepts of addiction, gender and social exclusion in Australian and Swedish drug policy

  • Research program: Social studies of addiction concepts
  • Project status: Completed
  • Start date: July 2013
  • Expected end date: December 2015
  • Completion date: December 2015
  • Funded by: Swedish Research Grant Council
  • Lead organisation:

In many areas of social policy, Sweden and Australia sit at opposite ends of the welfare state spectrum (Valentine, 2011). Sweden's approach is relatively open, non-stigmatising and inclusive while Australia's is relatively narrow and restrictive. It would seem logical that their respective drug policies follow similar lines, but instead, they present as the reverse, with Sweden promoting a narrow, restrictive, disciplinarian prohibitionist approach and Australia a more open, permissive harm reduction approach. How might we understand these two, seemingly contradictory, stories of Sweden and Australia? This project will explore this question through original research on three issues, all of which are central to the formulation of drug policy:

1. metaphors of exclusion in Swedish and Australian drug policy

2. discourses and concepts of 'addiction' in Swedish and Australian drug policy

3. the treatment of gender in Swedish and Australian drug policy

Two qualitative research methods will be employed: in-depth interviews with policy makers; and textual analysis of policy documents. This project is funded by a SoRAD Program Grant, the Australian Research Council and NDRI travel funds.

Name & Contact Details Role Research Program Location
  • Chief Investigator: Jukka Törrönen, Stockholm University
  • Chief Investigator: Mimmi Eriksson Tinghög, Stockholm University
  • Chief Investigator: Börje Olsson, Stockholm University

Moore, D., Fraser, S., Törrönen, J. and Eriksson Tinghög, M. (2015). Sameness and difference: Metaphor and politics in the constitution of addiction, social exclusion and gender in Australian and Swedish drug policy. International Journal of Drug Policy, 26, (4), pp. 420-428. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.01.011 [RJ1010] View web page